A improper control of generation of code ('code injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests.

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via a crafted HTTP request.

A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11 may allow a remote authenticated attacker with admin permission to elevate their privileges to root via crafted HTTP requests.

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized SQL commands via specially crafted requests.

A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.1 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.1 through 7.6.8, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.1 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.1 through 7.6.8 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to elevate their privileges via crafted JSON-RPC request.

A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.3 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.3 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.3 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.3 through 7.6.7 may allow an authenticated attacker with admin privileges to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.

A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain pre-required id and data via other means.

A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.2 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.7 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.10 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.2 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.7 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.10 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to write arbitrary files via a specially crafted archive.

A improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11 may allow an authenticated administrator to read or write arbitrary files or execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted requests to the GUI.

A missing authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.7, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.7 may allow an authenticated attacker to elevate their privileges via crafted JSON-RPC request.

A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to escalate their privileges, bypass authorization controls or impersonate internal services via specially crafted requests to the GUI.

A DCP Set of the IP suite that is refused is still stored

P-Net before 1.0.4 copies the IP suite of a DCP Set request to the current and the non-volatile configuration, and starts saving it, before the state of the device is checked. If the request is refused, for example because an Application Relationship is active, the configuration is not restored and is still saved. After a restart the device uses the refused address, and may not answer the controller or may use its address. A host with ADJACENT network access can use this while an Application Relationship is active.

Pulp-rpm: distribution tree publish creates directories from .treeinfo ids

A flaw was found in pulp-rpm when it publishes a distribution tree. Addon and variant ids from .treeinfo are used as directory names. A user who can sync or upload that tree can make the publish task create a new directory outside the task work area and write that tree's repository metadata and packages there, as the Pulp worker user. An existing file or directory is not replaced. The flaw does not disclose data and does not stop the service.

Foreman: authorization flaw in the foreman::controller::useraware handling used by api::v2::sshkeyscontroller

A flaw was found in Foreman’s Api::V2::SshKeysController, where the target user is resolved through Foreman::Controller::UserAware#find_user using User.find(params[:user_id]) without enforcing the required parent-user authorization check. An attacker with the create_ssh_keys permission can exploit this authorization bypass by submitting POST /api/v2/users/:user_id/ssh_keys with another user’s ID and injecting their own public SSH key into the targeted account. The injected key is subsequently propagated to hosts provisioned by that user, potentially allowing the attacker to authenticate to and gain SSH access to the victim’s managed hosts.

Foreman: authorization flaw in the mail-notification endpoints implemented by api::v2::mailnotificationscontroller

A flaw was found in Foreman’s Api::V2::MailNotificationsController, where authorization checks on user-specific mail-notification resources are insufficient. The GET /api/v2/users/:id/mail_notifications endpoint resolves the target account using User.find(params[:id]) without verifying that the authenticated user is authorized to access that user’s notification configuration. Additionally, the POST and PUT /api/v2/users/:user_id/mail_notifications paths call deny_access when the requester is unauthorized but fail to halt execution, allowing the request to continue and persist the unauthorized change despite a 403 response or subsequent DoubleRenderError. This can allow a user to disclose another user’s mail-notification configuration, including mail_query values, and, where write permissions apply, modify or create notification settings for another user.

Rubygem-katello: cross-tenant content view filter rule access and modification via unauthorized parent filter lookup

A flaw was found in Katello where the Content View Filter Rules API does not properly enforce authorization on the parent Content View Filter. An authenticated, low-privileged user with Content View permissions in one organization may be able to access and modify filter rules belonging to a Content View Filter in another organization by supplying that filter's identifier. This can result in unauthorized disclosure of filter-rule information and unauthorized changes to unpublished Content View filter configuration.

Candlepin: consumer certificate can register systems in another organization

A missing authorization check has been found in ConsumerResource.setupOwner() function of consumer registration module in the Candlepin package. The registration method checks permission to create a consumer only when the caller is a user. A consumer that authenticates with its identity certificate does not go through that check. A low-privileged network attacker or user who has a valid consumer certificate for one organization can register a new consumer in a different organization by supplying that organization's key. The response includes an identity certificate for the new consumer. With that certificate, the attacker can view the target organization's subscription pools. When the organization is not using simple content access, the attacker can attach that organization's entitlements to the new consumer.

Foreman: foreman: api host template render discloses secrets to view_hosts users (incomplete cve-2026-96659 fix)

A flaw was found in Foreman. An authenticated user with view_hosts privileges can retrieve rendered provisioning template content for a host via the hosts template API endpoint, disclosing sensitive data such as the host root password. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-96659, which hardened the web UI preview path but left the API host-template render path authorized for Viewer-level users.

Rubygem-safemode: safemode: jail allow-list bypass via op-assign expressions

A flaw was found in rubygem-safemode. Compound assignment expressions in sandboxed code are evaluated without mediating method calls through the Jail allow-list. An authenticated attacker who can supply template content can invoke arbitrary no-argument methods on objects exposed to the template renderer without Jail mediation, including destructive operations such as host deletion and disclosure of non-allow-listed object state.

Rubygem-smart_proxy_dynflow: dynflow console authorizes any client certificate the capsule ca signed

An improper authentication vulnerability has been found in the task console in the smart_proxy_dynflow package. The console accepts any client certificate signed by the capsule's certificate authority. It does not check the list of servers the capsule trusts. A low-privileged network attacker or user must already hold such a certificate. They can open the console and read job details. Those details include passwords when a job was given them. They can also cancel a running task.