WordPress Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce Plugin <= 12.4.4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AdTribes.Io Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce plugin <= 12.4.4 versions.

WordPress Advanced Booking Calendar Plugin <= 1.7.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Advanced Booking Calendar plugin <= 1.7.1 on WordPress.

WordPress All In One WP Security plugin <= 5.1.0 - Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities in All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall (WordPress plugin) <= 5.1.0 on WordPress.

SourceCodester Online Employee Leave Management System addemployee.php cross-site request forgery

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Employee Leave Management System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/addemployee.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The identifier VDB-207853 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Metabase vulnerable to arbitrary SQL execution from queryhash

Metabase is data visualization software. Prior to versions 0.44.5, 1.44.5, 0.43.7, 1.43.7, 0.42.6, 1.42.6, 0.41.9, and 1.41.9, unsaved SQL queries are auto-executed, which could pose a possible attack vector. This issue is patched in versions 0.44.5, 1.44.5, 0.43.7, 1.43.7, 0.42.6, 1.42.6, 0.41.9, and 1.41.9. Metabase no longer automatically executes ad-hoc native queries. Now the native editor shows the query and gives the user the option to manually run the query if they want.

Improper Input Validation leading to Path Traversal in CycloneDX BOM Repository Server

CycloneDX BOM Repository Server is a bill of materials (BOM) repository server for distributing CycloneDX BOMs. CycloneDX BOM Repository Server before version 2.0.1 has an improper input validation vulnerability leading to path traversal. A malicious user may potentially exploit this vulnerability to create arbitrary directories or a denial of service by deleting arbitrary directories. The vulnerability is resolved in version 2.0.1. The vulnerability is not exploitable with the default configuration with the post and delete methods disabled. This can be configured by modifying the `appsettings.json` file, or alternatively, setting the environment variables `ALLOWEDMETHODS__POST` and `ALLOWEDMETHODS__DELETE` to `false`.

WordPress Access Demo Importer plugin <= 1.0.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Arbitrary Plugin Activation

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Access Demo Importer <= 1.0.7 on WordPress allows an attacker to activate any installed plugin.

Information Exposure when using Puma with Rails

Puma is a Ruby/Rack web server built for parallelism. Prior to `puma` version `5.6.2`, `puma` may not always call `close` on the response body. Rails, prior to version `7.0.2.2`, depended on the response body being closed in order for its `CurrentAttributes` implementation to work correctly. The combination of these two behaviors (Puma not closing the body + Rails' Executor implementation) causes information leakage. This problem is fixed in Puma versions 5.6.2 and 4.3.11. This problem is fixed in Rails versions 7.02.2, 6.1.4.6, 6.0.4.6, and 5.2.6.2. Upgrading to a patched Rails _or_ Puma version fixes the vulnerability.

Elcomplus SmartPTT SCADA Server Cross-site Request Forgery

Elcomplus SmartPTT SCADA Server web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in PowerLogic ION7400, ION7650, ION83xx/84xx/85xx/8600, ION8650, ION8800, ION9000 and PM800 (see notification for affected versions), that could cause a user to perform an unintended action on the target device when using the HTTP web interface.

V-SOL GPON/EPON OLT Platform 2.03 Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

V-SOL GPON/EPON OLT Platform 2.03 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to create admin users, enable SSH, or modify system settings by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a specially crafted page.

QuMagie

A missing authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect QuMagie. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to access unauthorized data or perform unauthorized actions. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuMagie 2.9.0 and later

Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5370 Controllers – Multiple Vulnerabilities

A security issue exists within 1769 CompactLogix controllers due to the missing validation of sequence numbers and source IP addresses in the CIP protocol. This allows attacker to abuse the exposed Connection ID’s visible on the web interface to perform denial-of-service attacks, resulting in a minor fault.

WordPress Shared Files plugin <= 1.7.64 - Path Traversal vulnerability

Unauthenticated Path Traversal in Shared Files <= 1.7.64 versions.

WordPress WP Customer Area plugin <= 8.3.4 - Path Traversal vulnerability

Custom role Path Traversal in WP Customer Area <= 8.3.4 versions.

MISP automation endpoints may be exposed to CSRF when Sec-Fetch-Site protection is disabled by default

MISP contains an insecure default configuration in which the Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header control is disabled. When this setting is disabled, state-changing requests such as POST, PUT, or AJAX requests are not restricted based on the browser-provided Sec-Fetch-Site header. A remote unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious web page that causes an authenticated MISP user’s browser to issue cross-site requests to MISP automation endpoints. If successful, the forged requests may be processed with the privileges of the victim user, potentially allowing unauthorized modification of MISP data or configuration. Enabling Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header mitigates this issue, although operators of multi-homed MISP deployments should validate the setting before enforcing it.

PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys

Issue Summary: The PKCS#12 file processing fails to perform sufficient input validation for files that use Password-Based Message Authentication Code 1 (PBMAC1) integrity mechanism allowing a certificate and private key forgery. Impact Summary: An attacker impersonating a user can cause a service reading PKCS#12 files to accept forged certificates and private keys with a 1 in 256 probability. If a service accepting PKCS#12 files is using passwords for authenticating the received files, the attacker can create unencrypted PKCS#12 files that use PBMAC1 authentication that specifies an HMAC key of only one byte, allowing them to craft a file that will be accepted with a 1 in 256 probability. That would then cause the service to accept a certificate and private key controlled by the attacker. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages

Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success. If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message. In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.

Nezha Monitoring: Cross-site GET request can trigger stored cron commands on a victim's agents

Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 1.0.0 to before version 2.0.14, cross-site GET request can trigger stored cron commands on a victim's agents. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.14.

WordPress YITH WooCommerce Product Slider Carousel plugin <= 1.16.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in YITH YITH WooCommerce Product Slider Carousel allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects YITH WooCommerce Product Slider Carousel: from n/a through 1.16.0.