Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Group Permissions module in CMS Made Simple 1.7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make permission modifications.
Export limit exceeded: 10005 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search vulnerabilities
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple 1.8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reset the administrative password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ESAdmin/security.do in the administrator interface in IBM OmniFind Enterprise Edition before 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrative user via a saveNewUser action.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Shareaholic SexyBookmarks plugin 6.1.4.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that "manipulate plugin settings."
Zikula before 1.2.3 does not use the authid protection mechanism for (1) the lostpassword form and (2) mailpasswd processing, which makes it easier for remote attackers to generate a flood of password requests and possibly conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via multiple form submissions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/libs/ADMIN.php in BLOG:CMS 4.2.1.e, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in calendar.class.php in ApPHP Calendar (ApPHP CAL) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that use the (1) category_name, (2) category_description, (3) event_name, or (4) event_description parameter.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Power Manager (HPPM) 4.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mahara 1.2.x before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete blogs.
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Forms/PortForwarding_Edit_1 on the ZyXEL O2 DSL Router Classic allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the PortRule_Name parameter.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList before 2.10.13 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) edit administrator accounts.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration page in the Recaptcha (aka WP-reCAPTCHA) plugin 2.9.8.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable the CAPTCHA requirement or insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) recaptcha_opt_pubkey, (2) recaptcha_opt_privkey, (3) re_tabindex, (4) error_blank, (5) error_incorrect, (6) mailhide_pub, (7) mailhide_priv, (8) mh_replace_link, or (9) mh_replace_title parameter.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration screen in wp-relatedposts.php in the WP Related Posts plugin 1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) wp_relatedposts_title, (2) wp_relatedposts_num, or (3) wp_relatedposts_type parameter.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the SMC SMCD3G-CCR (aka Comcast Business Gateway) with firmware before 1.4.0.49.2 allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that perform a login via goform/login, or hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (2) enable external logins via an mso_remote_enable action to goform/RemoteRange or (3) change DNS settings via a manual_dns_enable action to goform/Basic.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the management screen on Buffalo WHR, WZR2, WZR, WER, and BBR series routers with firmware 1.x; BHR-4RV and FS-G54 routers with firmware 2.x; and AS-100 routers allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify settings, as demonstrated by changing the login password.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EC-CUBE before 2.11.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 4.0.4.0, and Aipo for ASP before 4.0.4.0, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify data.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.