Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
Export limit exceeded: 10005 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search vulnerabilities
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apply.cgi in Linksys WRT310Nv2 2.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change passwords and modify remote management ports.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server 2.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuy92706.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web-based management interface on Cisco Small Business 220 devices with firmware before 1.0.1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuz76230.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VMware vRealize Log Insight 2.x and 3.x before 3.3.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
HPE Service Manager Software 9.30, 9.31, 9.32, 9.33, 9.34, 9.35, 9.40, and 9.41 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information, modify data, and conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors, related to the Server, Web Client, Windows Client, and Service Request components.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on Crestron Electronics DM-TXRX-100-STR devices with firmware through 1.3039.00040 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp_ajax_wp_compression_test function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the script compression option.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 242; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.7, 3.x before 3.3.0.5, and 3.4.x before 3.4.4; UAA BOSH before 11.5 and 12.x before 12.5; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.40, 1.7.x before 1.7.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that approve or deny a scope via a profile or authorize approval page.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload files.
python-django: CSRF protection bypass on a site with Google Analytics
The cookie parsing code in Django before 1.8.15 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10, when used on a site with Google Analytics, allows remote attackers to bypass an intended CSRF protection mechanism by setting arbitrary cookies.
CSRF vulnerability on Technicolor TC dpc3941T (formerly Cisco dpc3941T) devices with firmware dpc3941-P20-18-v303r20421733-160413a-CMCST allows an attacker to change the Wi-Fi password, open the remote management interface, or reset the router.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ZPanel 10.0.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create new FTP users via a CreateFTP action in the ftp_management module to the default URI, (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the inFullname parameter in an UpdateAccountSettings action in the my_account module to zpanel/, or (3) conduct SQL injection attacks via the inEmailAddress parameter in an UpdateClient action in the manage_clients module to the default URI.
(Plone): Anonymous users can batch change titles of content items
The batch id change script (renameObjectsByPaths.py) in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote attackers to change the titles of content items by leveraging a valid CSRF token in a crafted request.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the DVS Custom Notification plugin 1.0.1 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change application settings or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Template CMS 2.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create an administrator user via an add action to admin/index.php or (2) conduct static PHP code injection attacks via the themes_editor parameter in an edit_template action to admin/index.php.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the admin panel in osCMax before 2.5.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the (1) status parameter to admin/stats_monthly_sales.php or (2) country parameter in a process action to admin/create_account_process.php.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XML Pack in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5.x through 8.5 FP3, 8.7.x through 8.7 FP2, and 9.1.x through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HMS Testimonials plugin before 2.0.11 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add new testimonials via the hms-testimonials-addnew page, (2) add new groups via the hms-testimonials-addnewgroup page, (3) change default settings via the hms-testimonials-settings page, (4) change advanced settings via the hms-testimonials-settings-advanced page, (5) change custom fields settings via the hms-testimonials-settings-fields page, or (6) change template settings via the hms-testimonials-templates-new page to wp-admin/admin.php.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Puppet Enterprise (PE) before 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that deleting a (1) report, (2) group, or (3) class or possibly have other unspecified impact.