Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.

SOCA Access Control System 180612 Cross-Site Request Forgery via Admin Interface

SOCA Access Control System 180612 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit forged requests to create admin accounts by tricking logged-in users into visiting a malicious site.

猫宁i Morning cross-site request forgery

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 猫宁i Morning up to bc782730c74ff080494f145cc363a0b4f43f7d3e. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available.

Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device.

Opal vulnerable to CSRF protection bypass

Opal is OBiBa’s core database application for biobanks or epidemiological studies. Prior to version 5.1.1, the protections against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) were insufficient application-wide. The referrer header is checked, and if it is invalid, the server returns 403. However, the referrer header can be dropped from CSRF requests using `<meta name="referrer" content="never">`, effectively bypassing this protection. Version 5.1.1 contains a patch for the issue.

TableProgressTracking's missing CSRF protection allows unauthorized state changes

TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user on a wiki with the extension enabled, would trigger unintended authenticated actions through the victim's browser. Due to the lack of token validation, an attacker can delete or track progress against tables. This issue is patched in version 1.2.1 of the extension.

WP All Import Pro <= 4.9.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Imported Content Deletion

The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

WP System <= 1.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting

The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP S/4 HANA (Learning Solution)

SAP Learning Solution is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing an attacker to trick authenticated user into sending unintended requests to the server. GET-based OData function is named in a way that it violates the expected behaviour. This issue could impact both the confidentiality and integrity of the application without affecting the availability.

CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform <= 1.13.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Module Deletion

The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) <= 1.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting

The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.3.3 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, the user may be tricked to do unintended operations.

Synaccess netBooter NP-0801DU 7.4 Cross-Site Request Forgery via Admin Interface

Synaccess netBooter NP-0801DU 7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden form submissions to add admin users by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a malicious page.

WordPress FanBridge signup plugin <= 0.6 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FanBridge FanBridge signup fanbridge-signup allows Stored XSS.This issue affects FanBridge signup: from n/a through <= 0.6.

WordPress Just TinyMCE Custom Styles plugin <= 1.2.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just TinyMCE Custom Styles just-tinymce-styles allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just TinyMCE Custom Styles: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.

WordPress Auto Alt Text plugin <= 2.5.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Valerio Monti Auto Alt Text auto-alt-text allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Alt Text: from n/a through <= 2.5.2.

HCL Glovius Cloud is susceptible to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint.

WordPress HotelRunner Booking Widget Plugin <= 1.6 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in integrationshotelrunner HotelRunner Booking Widget hotelrunner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects HotelRunner Booking Widget: from n/a through <= 1.6.

WordPress hpb seo plugin for WordPress plugin <= 3.0.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress hpbseo allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects hpb seo plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.0.1.

VirtueMart - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the product image upload function of VirtueMart that bypasses the CSRF protection token. An attacker is able to craft a special CSRF request which will allow unrestricted file upload into the VirtueMart media manager.