In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In sensor driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service in kernel.

In devinfo, there is a possible information disclosure due to a missing SELinux policy. This could lead to local information disclosure of device identifier with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09555228; Issue ID: MSV-2760.

The AES-GCM specification in RFC 5084, as used in Android 5.x and 6.x, recommends 12 octets for the aes-ICVlen parameter field, which might make it easier for attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism and discover an authentication key via a crafted application, aka internal bug 26234568. NOTE: The vendor disputes the existence of this potential issue in Android, stating "This CVE was raised in error: it referred to the authentication tag size in GCM, whose default according to ASN.1 encoding (12 bytes) can lead to vulnerabilities. After careful consideration, it was decided that the insecure default value of 12 bytes was a default only for the encoding and not default anywhere else in Android, and hence no vulnerability existed.

In keyInstall, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08358566; Issue ID: ALPS08358566.

there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Insufficient policy enforcement in custom tabs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 106.0.5249.62 allowed an attacker who convinced the user to install an application to bypass same origin policy via a crafted application. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

In modem-ps-nas-ngmm, there is a possible undefined behavior due to incorrect error handling. This could lead to remote information disclosure no additional execution privileges needed

In SecurityCommand message after as security has been actived., there is a possible improper input validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure no additional execution privileges needed

In modem-ps-nas-ngmm, there is a possible undefined behavior due to incorrect error handling. This could lead to remote information disclosure no additional execution privileges needed

In modem driver, there is a possible system crash due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed

In ril service, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed

In ril service, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed

In ril service, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed

In modem-ps-nas-ngmm, there is a possible undefined behavior due to incorrect error handling. This could lead to remote information disclosure no additional execution privileges needed