Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gitea | Gitea | unaffected |
|
No data.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gitea | Gitea |
|
No CVSS v4.0
No CVSS v3.0
No CVSS v2
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
Exploit prediction score: < 1% (0.199% probability within 30 days)
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:a:gitea:gitea:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics |
cvssV3_1
|
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| First Time appeared |
Gitea
Gitea gitea |
|
| Vendors & Products |
Gitea
Gitea gitea |
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | With `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` set to a matching entry such as `*` or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as `169.254.169.254`, even when `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configuration is not affected. | |
| Title | Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-918 | |
| References |
|