crypto: ccp - Check for page allocation failure correctly in TIO
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | unaffected |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Linux | Linux | affected |
|
No data.
No data.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Linux | Linux Kernel |
|
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
Ubuntu USN |
USN-8887-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-8888-1 | Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-8889-1 | Linux kernel (OEM) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-8887-2 | Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-8888-2 | Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-8887-3 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-9003-1 | Linux kernel (NVIDIA) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-9043-1 | Linux kernel (NVIDIA) vulnerabilities |
No CVSS v4.0
No CVSS v3.0
No CVSS v2
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
Exploit prediction score: < 1% (0.165% probability within 30 days)
Key SSVC decision points have not yet been added.
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
threat_severity
|
threat_severity
|
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | CWE-476 |
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | CWE-476 |
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics |
cvssV3_1
|
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | CWE-476 |
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: ccp - Check for page allocation failure correctly in TIO Sashiko notes: > if __snp_alloc_firmware_pages() returns NULL under memory pressure, is it > safe to pass it directly to page_address()? > > On architectures without HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL, page_address(NULL) might > compute a deterministic but invalid, non-zero virtual address. The > subsequent if (tio_status) check would then evaluate to true, and > sev_tsm_init_locked() would dereference the invalid pointer. Indeed, page_address(NULL) will return non-NULL garbage here. Fix this by checking the page allocation itself for NULL, not the resulting virtual address. | |
| Title | crypto: ccp - Check for page allocation failure correctly in TIO | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|