Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | Unbound | unaffected |
|
No data.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nlnetlabs | Unbound |
|
Vendor Solution
This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
Debian DSA |
DSA-6507-1 | unbound security update |
No CVSS v4.0
No CVSS v3.0
No CVSS v2
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
Exploit prediction score: < 1% (0.124% probability within 30 days)
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| First Time appeared |
Nlnetlabs
Nlnetlabs unbound |
|
| Vendors & Products |
Nlnetlabs
Nlnetlabs unbound |
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | CWE-125 | |
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
threat_severity
|
threat_severity
|
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics |
ssvc
|
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as 'datstart + dname_valid(datstart, ...)' and passes it straight to 'query_dname_tolower()' without checking that a second name is actually present in the RDATA. The wire-format parser accepts multi-dname RRs whose RDATA ends after the first name, so an attacker who runs a DNSSEC-signed authoritative server can deliver a record with an absent second domain name (e.g. SOA record) and cause 'query_dname_tolower()' to walk label-by-label through stale bytes in the per-worker 'env->scratch_buffer', past the end of that heap allocation if 'msg-buffer-size' has been lowered from the default. This leads to heap buffer overflow and on a release build the outcome relies heavily on the contents of the buffer tail and the adjacent heap chunk. | |
| Title | Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-354 | |
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
cvssV3_1
|