ses's global contour bindings leak into Compartment lexical scope
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| endojs | endo | affected |
|
No data.
No data.
No data available yet.
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
EUVD |
EUVD-2025-11857 | ses's global contour bindings leak into Compartment lexical scope |
Github GHSA |
GHSA-h9w6-f932-gq62 | ses's global contour bindings leak into Compartment lexical scope |
No CVSS v3.1
No CVSS v3.0
No CVSS v2
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
Exploit prediction score: < 1% (0.587% probability within 30 days)
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics |
ssvc
|
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | SES safely executes third-party JavaScript 'strict' mode programs in compartments that have no excess authority in their global scope. Prior to version 1.12.0, web pages and web extensions using `ses` and the Compartment API to evaluate third-party code in an isolated execution environment that have also elsewhere used `const`, `let`, and `class` bindings in the top-level scope of a `<script>` tag will have inadvertently revealed these bindings in the lexical scope of third-party code. This issue has been patched in version 1.12.0. Workarounds for this issue involve either avoiding top-level `let`, `const`, or `class` bindings in `<script>` tags, or change these to `var` bindings to be reflected on `globalThis`. | |
| Title | ses's global contour bindings leak into Compartment lexical scope | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-497 | |
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
cvssV4_0
|
No data.