CVE-2012-3372

{"containers": {"cna": {"affected": [{"product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "n/a"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"dateUpdated": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat"}, "references": [{"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory", "tags": ["mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"], "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}], "tags": ["disputed"], "x_legacyV4Record": {"CVE_data_meta": {"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2012-3372", "STATE": "PUBLIC"}, "affects": {"vendor": {"vendor_data": [{"product": {"product_data": [{"product_name": "n/a", "version": {"version_data": [{"version_value": "n/a"}]}}]}, "vendor_name": "n/a"}]}}, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": {"description_data": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\""}]}, "problemtype": {"problemtype_data": [{"description": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "n/a"}]}]}, "references": {"reference_data": [{"name": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"name": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"name": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"name": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]}}}, "adp": [{"providerMetadata": {"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z"}, "title": "CVE Program Container", "references": [{"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory", "tags": ["mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ", "x_transferred"], "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]}, {"problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"type": "CWE", "lang": "en", "description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information"}]}], "metrics": [{"cvssV3_1": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 7.4, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}}, {"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"timestamp": "2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z", "id": "CVE-2012-3372", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "total"}], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "version": "2.0.3"}}}], "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z"}}]}, "cveMetadata": {"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2012-3372", "datePublished": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z", "dateReserved": "2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z", "state": "PUBLISHED"}, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1"}

{"containers": {"cna": {"affected": [{"product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "n/a"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"dateUpdated": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat"}, "references": [{"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory", "tags": ["mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"], "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}], "tags": ["disputed"], "x_legacyV4Record": {"CVE_data_meta": {"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2012-3372", "STATE": "PUBLIC"}, "affects": {"vendor": {"vendor_data": [{"product": {"product_data": [{"product_name": "n/a", "version": {"version_data": [{"version_value": "n/a"}]}}]}, "vendor_name": "n/a"}]}}, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": {"description_data": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\""}]}, "problemtype": {"problemtype_data": [{"description": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "n/a"}]}]}, "references": {"reference_data": [{"name": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"name": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"name": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"name": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]}}}, "adp": [{"providerMetadata": {"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z"}, "title": "CVE Program Container", "references": [{"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory", "tags": ["mailing-list", "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ", "x_transferred"], "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]}, {"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "metrics": [{"cvssV3_1": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 7.4, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}}, {"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2012-3372", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "total"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z"}}}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "type": "CWE", "description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-21T19:32:09.694Z"}}]}, "cveMetadata": {"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2012-3372", "datePublished": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z", "dateReserved": "2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z", "state": "PUBLISHED"}, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1"}

{"affected": [{"affectedData": [{"product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "n/a"}]}], "source": "secalert@redhat.com"}], "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C", "vulnerable": true}], "negate": false, "operator": "OR"}]}], "cveTags": [{"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": ["disputed"]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "** EN DISPUTA ** La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto del dispositivo Cyberoam UTM utiliza la misma clave privada en distintas instalaciones de clientes, lo que que facilita a atacantes MITM (man-in-the-Middle u hombre-en-medio) a espiar servidores SSL aprovechando la presencia del certificado Cyberoam_SSL_CA en una lista de confianza de autoridades emisoras de certificados ra\u00edz. NOTA: el vendedor se opone a la importancia de esta cuesti\u00f3n, porque el dispositivo \"no permite la importaci\u00f3n o exportaci\u00f3n de la mencionada clave privada\""}], "id": "CVE-2012-3372", "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:43:05.787", "metrics": {"cvssMetricV2": [{"acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.8, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0"}, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 4.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": true}], "cvssMetricV31": [{"cvssData": {"attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 7.4, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.1"}, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 5.2, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary"}], "ssvcV203": [{"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "ssvcData": {"id": "CVE-2012-3372", "options": [{"exploitation": "none"}, {"automatable": "no"}, {"technicalImpact": "total"}], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z", "version": "2.0.3"}}]}, "published": "2012-07-09T10:20:44.417", "references": [{"source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}, {"source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"}], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [{"description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-310"}], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary"}]}

{}

{}