python buffer overflow
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | n/a | affected |
|
| Package | CPE | Advisory | Released Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Network Satellite Server v 4.2 | |||
| rhn-solaris-bootstrap-0:5.0.2-3 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:4.2::el4 | RHSA-2008:0525 | 2008-06-30T00:00:00Z |
| rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_0_2_3-0:1-0 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:4.2::el4 | RHSA-2008:0525 | 2008-06-30T00:00:00Z |
| Red Hat Network Satellite Server v 4.2 (RHEL3) | |||
| rhn-solaris-bootstrap-0:5.0.2-3 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:4.2::el3 | RHSA-2008:0525 | 2008-06-30T00:00:00Z |
| rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_0_2_3-0:1-0 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:4.2::el3 | RHSA-2008:0525 | 2008-06-30T00:00:00Z |
| Red Hat Network Satellite Server v 5.0 | |||
| rhn-solaris-bootstrap-0:5.0.2-3 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:5.0:el4 | RHSA-2008:0264 | 2008-05-20T00:00:00Z |
| rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_0_2_3-0:1-0 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:5.0:el4 | RHSA-2008:0264 | 2008-05-20T00:00:00Z |
| Red Hat Network Satellite Server v 5.1 | |||
| rhn-solaris-bootstrap-0:5.1.1-3 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:5.1::el4 | RHSA-2008:0629 | 2008-08-13T00:00:00Z |
| rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_1_1_3-0:1-0 | cpe:/a:redhat:network_satellite:5.1::el4 | RHSA-2008:0629 | 2008-08-13T00:00:00Z |
No data available yet.
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
EUVD |
EUVD-2006-1546 | Stack-based buffer overflow in Python 2.4.2 and earlier, running on Linux 2.6.12.5 under gcc 4.0.3 with libc 2.3.5, allows local users to cause a "stack overflow," and possibly gain privileges, by running a script from a current working directory that has a long name, related to the realpath function. NOTE: this might not be a vulnerability. However, the fact that it appears in a programming language interpreter could mean that some applications are affected, although attack scenarios might be limited because the attacker might already need to cross privilege boundaries to cause an exploitable program to be placed in a directory with a long name; or, depending on the method that Python uses to determine the current working directory, setuid applications might be affected. |
No CVSS v4.0
No CVSS v3.1
No CVSS v3.0
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
Exploit prediction score: < 1% (0.908% probability within 30 days)
Key SSVC decision points have not yet been added.
No history.