Search vulnerabilities

Results 11,120

Export CSV
CVE-2026-3911

Org.keycloak.services.resources.admin.userresource: keycloak: information disclosure of disabled user attributes via administrative endpoint

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with the view-users role could exploit a vulnerability in the UserResource component. By accessing a specific administrative endpoint, this user could improperly retrieve user attributes that were configured to be hidden. This unauthorized information disclosure could expose sensitive user data.

CVSS 3.1 · 2.7 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-20034

Cisco Unity Connection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unity Connection could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted API request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as root, possibly resulting in the complete compromise of a targeted device.&nbsp;To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected device.

CVSS 3.1 · 8.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-8022

chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML

Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

CVSS 3.1 · 3.1 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Apple Google Linux and 1 more
Products
CVE-2025-31957

HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

HHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data.

CVSS 3.1 · 2.6 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-40326

Masa CMS CSRF in site bundle creation allows unauthorized site data export

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the createBundle method in `csettings.cfc` does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for site bundle creation requests. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage or link that, when visited by a logged-in administrator, triggers the silent creation of a comprehensive site bundle. This bundle is saved to a predictable, publicly accessible web directory. An unauthenticated attacker can then retrieve the bundle and obtain site content, user account data, password hashes, form submissions, email lists, plugins, and configuration data. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, remove unexpected bundle files from public directories, restrict access to the affected endpoint, and limit exposure of administrative sessions.

CVSS 4.0 · 7.1 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2025-68604

WordPress WPGraphQL plugin <= 2.5.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 2.5.3.

CVSS 3.1 · 5.4 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Products
CVE-2026-40174

Masa CMS CSRF in user address management allows unauthorized address changes

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cUsers.updateAddress function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for user address management operations. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that adds, modifies, or deletes user address records, including email addresses and phone numbers. This can be used to alter contact information, redirect organizational communications, and corrupt address data in the user directory. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, or deploy filtering rules to block forged requests to the affected endpoint

CVSS 4.0 · 7.1 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-40309

Masa CMS CSRF in trash management allows unauthorized permanent deletion of deleted content

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cTrash.empty function does not validate anti-CSRF tokens for trash management requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that empties the trash and permanently deletes all deleted content. This can cause irreversible data loss and disrupt recovery of content intended for restoration. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and maintain current database backups to recover from unauthorized deletion.

CVSS 4.0 · 7.2 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-41663

Admidio: CSRF on Admin Preferences Triggers Unauthorized Backup, .htaccess Write, and Email Send

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.9.

CVSS 3.1 · 3.5 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-40325

Masa CMS CSRF in content restoration allows unauthorized restoration of deleted content

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the `cTrash.restore` function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for content restoration requests. An attacker can trick a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that restores deleted items from the trash and places them at an attacker-controlled location in the site structure through the parentid parameter. This can restore previously deleted malicious or outdated content, expose sensitive documents by moving them into publicly accessible locations, and disrupt site structure or content integrity. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and regularly empty the trash to reduce the amount of content available for unauthorized restoration.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-7963

chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker

Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

CVSS 3.1 · 8.3 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Apple Google Linux and 1 more
Products
CVE-2025-31983

HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration vulnerability due to CSP header

HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration vulnerability due to CSP header. This could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts increasing the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) and potential exposure of sensitive information.

CVSS 3.1 · 3.7 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-6701

addfreespace <= 0.1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Page

The addfreespace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-6700

DX Sources <= 2.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The DX Sources plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page_build function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged request that modifies the plugin's configuration options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-6702

Publish 2 Ping.fm <= 1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'wpPingPingKey' Parameter

The Publish 2 Ping.fm plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the '/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=admin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.1 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-39371

RedwoodSDK has a CSRF vulnerability in server function dispatch via GET requests

RedwoodSDK is a server-first React framework. From 1.0.0-beta.50 to 1.0.5, erver functions exported from "use server" files could be invoked via GET requests, bypassing their intended HTTP method. In cookie-authenticated applications, this allowed cross-site GET navigations to trigger state-changing functions, because browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies on top-level GET requests. This affected all server functions -- both serverAction() handlers and bare exported functions in "use server" files. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.6.

CVSS 3.1 · 8.1 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-36956

Cross‑Site Request Forgery in Dbit N300 T1 Pro Router Web Management

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the Dbit N300 T1 Pro wireless router V1.0.0. The router fails to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints such as /api/setWlan. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.

CVSS 3.1 · 8.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-3140

Ultimate Dashboard <= 3.8.14 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Module Activation/Deactivation

The Ultimate Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.14. This is due to a flawed nonce validation conditional in the 'handle_module_actions' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle plugin modules on or off via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
CVE-2026-28402

nimiq/core-rs-albatross's nimiq-blockchain missing proposal body root verification

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.2.2, a malicious or compromised validator that is elected as proposer can publish a macro block proposal where `header.body_root` does not match the actual macro body hash. The proposal can pass proposal verification because the macro proposal verification path validates the header but does not validate the binding `body_root == hash(body)`; later code expects this binding and may panic on mismatch, crashing validators. Note that the impact is only for validator nodes. The patch for this vulnerability is formally released as part of v1.2.2. The patch adds the corresponding body root verification in the proposal checks. No known workarounds are available.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.1 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-36960

Cross‑Site Request Forgery in U‑SPEED N300 Router Web Management Interface

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the U-SPEED N300 Rounter V1.0.0. The device does not implement CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.

CVSS 3.1 · 8.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products