Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP Web Dispatcher and Internet Communication Manager

SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher does not perform sufficient request validation in certain administrative functionality. In the context of SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher, an unauthenticated attacker could trick a logged-on administrator into visiting a malicious link. Visiting the link could cause unintended actions in the administrator's session. Successful exploitation could lead to a temporary compromise of the SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, and partial impact on integrity, and availability.

Tasmota 16.0.0 CSRF via Referer Header Validation Bypass

Tasmota through 16.0.0, fixed in commit 1cb7ebc, contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass Referer-based CSRF protection in HttpCheckPriviledgedAccess() by crafting a Referer header where the device hostname or IP appears as a substring immediately after http://.evil.com/. Attackers can lure an administrator on the device's network to a malicious page to issue arbitrary console commands and reconfigure Wi-Fi, MQTT, settings, or firmware on devices lacking a WebPassword.

OpenEMR: CSRF Protection Bypass on IPPF Point-of-Sale Void and Regen Operations

OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to 8.3.0, interface/patient_file/pos_checkout_ippf.php performs state-changing void, voidall, and regen operations through GET requests without CSRF token validation. The form_checksum integrity check is conditional and is skipped when the parameter is omitted, allowing a cross-site request to force an authenticated billing user to void checkouts or regenerate invoice counters. The resulting changes can alter ledger state, financial reporting, and audit records. This issue is fixed in version 8.3.0.

Livebook Teams identity callback lacks state binding, allowing login CSRF

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows an attacker to authenticate a victim's browser session under the attacker's own Livebook Teams identity. When Livebook is configured to use Livebook Teams for identity, Livebook.ZTA.LivebookTeams.handle_request/4 in lib/livebook/zta/livebook_teams.ex handles the OAuth-style callback carrying a teams_identity marker and a code parameter. The clause exchanges that code for an access token and writes the token into the browser session without verifying any value that ties the callback to the browser session that started the login. No state or nonce is generated when the flow is initiated: Livebook.Teams.Requests.create_auth_request/1 in lib/livebook/teams/requests.ex sends an empty request body, so no per-attempt value is ever registered, and the callback clause has nothing to compare against. An attacker who holds membership in the same Livebook Teams organisation as the target instance can therefore begin the login flow themselves, retain the resulting authorization code without redeeming it, and induce a victim to open a crafted URL carrying that code. The victim's browser completes the exchange and the resulting session is bound to the attacker's identity rather than the victim's. The victim is not required to hold any particular privilege, and no credential belonging to the victim is involved. The vulnerability does not allow the attacker to authenticate as the victim. The consequence is that a user believes they are working in their own authenticated session while they are in fact operating as another identity. Work performed in that session is attributed to the attacker's account, and secrets, uploaded data, or notebook results the victim produces are exposed to the attacker rather than kept in the victim's own account. The authorization code must be redeemed within a short window after the login flow begins, which constrains the timing of the attack but not its feasibility. This issue affects livebook: from 0.15.0 before 0.18.7 and from 0.19.0 before 0.19.9.

CSRF in backend

An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform a CSRF attack on a logged in backend user allowing for execution of multiple critical system actions. This could allow an attacker to shutdown the server or restore an uploaded backup. This can result in a loss of integrity and availability.

WordPress WPIDE – File Manager & Code Editor plugin <= 3.6.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in XplodedThemes WPIDE – File Manager & Code Editor wpide allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WPIDE – File Manager & Code Editor: from n/a through 3.6.4.

IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for GET requests.

A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Studio Pro 11 (All versions >= V11.15.0 < V11.16.0), Mendix Studio Pro 11.12 (All versions >= V11.12.6 < V11.12.7). The affected products MCP Server does not properly validate Content-Type and Origin headers on incoming HTTP requests, leaving it vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). This could allow a malicious web page to trick a user's browser into sending unauthorized requests and executing unintended actions on the local MCP Server.

Admin and Site Enhancements < 8.8.4 - Unauthenticated Administrator-Role Restoration via reset-for Parameter

The Admin and Site Enhancements (ASE) WordPress plugin before 8.8.4, admin-site-enhancements-pro WordPress plugin before 8.8.4 does not perform authentication, authorization, or nonce checks on a role-restoration request handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to restore a previously demoted administrator account back to the administrator role. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2024-43333 / CVE-2025-24648, which closed the issue for only one of the demotion paths the WordPress role API exposes.

LatePoint < 5.6.3 - Multiple Privileged Actions via CSRF

The Appointment Booking Plugin WordPress plugin before 5.6.3 does not validate a CSRF nonce on several state-changing actions handled by its central request dispatcher, allowing attackers to perform privileged actions, such as overwriting the booking-form configuration or disconnecting the connected payment gateway, via Cross-Site Request Forgery against a logged-in administrator.

SourceCodester Smart Attendance System with QR Code Scanner cross-site request forgery

A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Smart Attendance System with QR Code Scanner 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Vulnerability in the Siebel Life Sciences product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Web UI). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Life Sciences. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Life Sciences, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).

CGI versions before 5.00 for Perl allow the POSTDATA, PUTDATA, PATCHDATA and XForms:Model parameters to be set from the query string or form fields

CGI versions before 5.00 for Perl allow the POSTDATA, PUTDATA, PATCHDATA and XForms:Model parameters to be set from the query string or form fields. CGI stores a non-form request body under POSTDATA, PUTDATA or PATCHDATA, and an XForms body under XForms:Model, but also accepts these names from the query string, a form field or a multipart part, so an application cannot tell a client-sent value from the real body. A cross-site HTML form can post POSTDATA={"admin":true} to an endpoint that reads JSON from param('POSTDATA'), a request forgery that needs no CORS preflight.

IBM Verify Directory is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.4 and IBM Verify Directory 11.0.0 does not set the SameSite attribute on session cookies, making it vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker can cause authenticated users' browsers to send unauthorized requests to the application.

SharpEmu: Cross-site request forgery in the debugger frontend leads to arbitrary process execution

SharpEmu is an experimental PlayStation 5 emulator for Windows and Linux. In version 0.0.3-release.3 and earlier, the repository-provided debugger frontend tooling is vulnerable while running. This tooling is not included in the release archives. The frontend exposes an HTTP API on 127.0.0.1:8765 without authentication or CSRF token. Its  do_POST  handler in  tools/SharpEmu.DebuggerFrontend/debugger_frontend.py  does not validate the Origin, Referer, Sec-Fetch-Site, or Host headers. The  _read_json_body()  function also accepts JSON sent with browser-simple content types instead of requiring  application/json . A malicious page that can reach the loopback listener can send cross-origin requests to  /api/launch ,  /api/command , and  /api/connect . Chromium may require Local Network Access permission for pages served from public origins. Local-origin pages and other delivery paths are not consistently subject to this restriction. The  /api/launch  endpoint accepts an attacker-selected  emulatorPath  if it points to an existing file on the victim’s host. On POSIX systems, that file must also be executable. The endpoint additionally requires an existing  ebootPath . The  /api/command  endpoint exposes debugger operations, including  write-memory ,  set-register , and  continue . The  /api/connect  endpoint can initiate outbound TCP connections. These operations can let an attacker execute an existing binary with the victim’s privileges, control the attached emulated process, or reach network services accessible from the host. DNS rebinding can additionally let the attacker read API responses interactively. This issue is fixed in version 0.0.3-release.3-patch.1

AB Download Manager before 1.11.2 Arbitrary File Write via /start-headless-download CSRF

AB Download Manager before 1.11.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its unauthenticated browser-integration API that allows remote attackers to write attacker-chosen files to arbitrary paths. A malicious web page can send a text/plain request to /start-headless-download with crafted folder and name values, placing payloads in startup folders for code execution on next login.

Vikunja before 2.7.1 Login CSRF via Migration OAuth Callbacks

Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to import their data into a victim's account because the Todoist, Microsoft To Do, and Trello migration OAuth callbacks lack a bound state parameter. Attackers can authorize their own account, keep the unused callback code or token, and lure a logged-in victim to the migration callback route to auto-import attacker-chosen projects and tasks containing phishing links.

Oracle Trusted Answer Search Vulnerability Enables Unauthorized Data Access

Vulnerability in Oracle Trusted Answer Search (component: Application expert UI). The supported version that is affected is 26.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Trusted Answer Search. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Trusted Answer Search, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Trusted Answer Search accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Trusted Answer Search accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N).

IBM Cognos Command Center has addressed vulnerabilities

IBM Cognos Command Center 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.5 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized processes due to cross-site request forgery.

WordPress Superb Addons: Blocks, Patterns &amp; theme Designer plugin <= 4.2.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Suplugins Superb Addons: Blocks, Patterns &amp; Theme Designer superb-blocks allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Superb Addons: Blocks, Patterns &amp; Theme Designer: from n/a through 4.2.4.