Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Spatial component in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB07.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Core RDBMS component in Oracle Database 11.1.0.6 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB08.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 have unknown impact and remote attack vectors, related to (1) the Export component (DB02), (2) Oracle Text (DB04), (3) Oracle Text (DB05), (4) Spatial component (DB07), and (5) Advanced Security Option (DB19).

The GIOP service in TNS Listener in the Oracle Net Services component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or read potentially sensitive memory via a connect GIOP packet with an invalid data size, which triggers a buffer over-read, aka DB22.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the device management interface in Buffalo AirStation WHR-G54S 1.20 allows remote attackers to make configuration changes as an administrator via HTTP requests to certain HTML pages in the res parameter with an inp req parameter to cgi-bin/cgi, as demonstrated by accessing (1) ap.html and (2) filter_ip.html.

Buffer overflow in the XDB.XDB_PITRIG_PKG.PITRIG_DROPMETADATA procedure in Oracle 10g R2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) OWNER or (2) NAME argument.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+ and 10.1.0.5 unknown impact and remote attack vectors, related to (1) Import (DB01) and (2) Advanced Queuing (DB25). NOTE: as of 20071108, Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that DB25 is for a buffer overflow in the DBLINK_INFO procedure in the DBMS_AQADM_SYS package.

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the CTXSYS Intermedia application for the Oracle Text component (CTX_DOC) in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) THEMES, (2) GIST, (3) TOKENS, (4) FILTER, (5) HIGHLIGHT, and (6) MARKUP procedures, aka DB03. NOTE: remote unauthenticated attack vectors exist when CTXSYS is used with oracle Application Server.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Internet Directory component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8 and 9.2.0.8DV, and Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.3.0.0 up to 10.1.3.3.0, and 10.1.2.0.1 up to 10.1.2.2.0, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka AS05.

Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleTools component in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.48.15 and 8.49.07 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka PSE02.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to have an unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_DRS in the DataGuard component (DB03), (2) SYS.DBMS_STANDARD in the PL/SQL component (DB10), (3) MDSYS.RTREE_IDX in the Spatial component (DB16), and (4) SQL Compiler (DB17). NOTE: a reliable researcher claims that DB17 is for using Views to perform unauthorized insert, update, or delete actions.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5 allow remote authenticated users to have unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_PRVTAQIS in the Advanced Queuing component (DB02) and (2) MDSYS.MD in the Spatial component (DB12). NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that DB02 is for SQL injection and DB12 is for a buffer overflow.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Data Mining component for Oracle Database 10g Release 2 10.2.0.2 and 10.2.0.3, 10g 10.1.0.5, and Oracle9i Database Release 2 9.2.0.7, 9.2.0.8, and 9.2.0.8DV has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors related to DMSYS.DMP_SYS, aka DB04.

Unspecified vulnerability in Workflow Cartridge, as used in Oracle Database Server 9.2.0.1, 10.1.0.2, and 10.2.0.1; Application Server 9.0.4.3 and 10.1.2.0.2; Collaboration Suite 10.1.2; and E-Business Suite; has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors, aka OWF01.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in boundary_rules.jsp in the Administration Front End for Oracle Enterprise (Ultra) Search, as used in Database Server 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.2, and in Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via the EXPTYPE parameter, aka SES01.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 allow remote authenticated users to have unknown impact via (1) DBMS_JAVA_TEST in the JavaVM component (DB01), (2) Oracle Text component (DB09), and (3) MDSYS.SDO_GEOR_INT in the Spatial component (DB15). NOTE: a reliable researcher claims that DB01 is SQL injection in DBMS_PRVTAQIS.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 allow remote authenticated users to have an unknown impact via (a) the Oracle Text component, including (1) unspecified vectors (DB05), (2) CTXSYS.DRVXMD (DB06), (3) CTXSYS.DRI_MOVE_CTXSYS (DB07), (4) CTXSYS.DRVXMD (DB08), and (b) JavaVM (DB14).

Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Replication component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB10. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed claims that these are buffer overflows in kkzi.o for the SYS.DBMS_SNAP_INTERNAL package using the (1) SNAP_OWNER or (2) SNAP_NAME parameters.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Change Data Capture (CDC) component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.2 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB09. NOTE: as of 20070424, oracle has not disputed reliable claims that this issue involves multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the DBMS_CDC_PUBLISH with remote authenticated vectors involving the "java classes in CDC.jar."

Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Text component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+ and 9.2.0.5 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB12. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed reliable claims that this involves a buffer overflow in the ctxsrv server daemon.