Search vulnerabilities

Results 1,478

Export CSV
CVE-2025-55332

Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Improper enforcement of behavioral workflow in Windows BitLocker allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature with a physical attack.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.1 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
Bitlocker Server Windows and 21 more
CVE-2025-55330

Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Improper enforcement of behavioral workflow in Windows BitLocker allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature with a physical attack.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.1 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2025-54915

Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.7 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2025-54104

Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.7 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2025-54094

Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.7 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2025-53810

Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.7 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2025-21408

Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CVSS 3.1 · 8.8 High EPSS 1.3% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2025-29791

Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS 1.1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2025-48815

Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows SSDP Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2025-13751

OpenVPN: OpenVPN: Local denial of service vulnerability in interactive service agent

Interactive service agent in OpenVPN version 2.5.0 through 2.6.16 and 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc2 on Windows allows a local authenticated user to connect to the service and trigger an error causing a local denial of service.

CVSS 4.0 · 1.3 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2025-48756

In group_number in the scsir crate 0.2.0 for Rust, there can be an overflow because a hardware device may expect a small number of bits (e.g., 5 bits) for group number.

CVSS 3.1 · 2.9 Low EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2023-23442

Some Honor products are affected by type confusion vulnerability, successful exploitation could cause information leak.

CVSS 3.1 · 4.6 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2023-46842

x86 HVM hypercalls may trigger Xen bug check

Unlike 32-bit PV guests, HVM guests may switch freely between 64-bit and other modes. This in particular means that they may set registers used to pass 32-bit-mode hypercall arguments to values outside of the range 32-bit code would be able to set them to. When processing of hypercalls takes a considerable amount of time, the hypervisor may choose to invoke a hypercall continuation. Doing so involves putting (perhaps updated) hypercall arguments in respective registers. For guests not running in 64-bit mode this further involves a certain amount of translation of the values. Unfortunately internal sanity checking of these translated values assumes high halves of registers to always be clear when invoking a hypercall. When this is found not to be the case, it triggers a consistency check in the hypervisor and causes a crash.

CVSS 3.1 · 6.5 Medium EPSS 8.5% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2024-53128

sched/task_stack: fix object_is_on_stack() for KASAN tagged pointers

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/task_stack: fix object_is_on_stack() for KASAN tagged pointers When CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS and CONFIG_KASAN_STACK are enabled, the object_is_on_stack() function may produce incorrect results due to the presence of tags in the obj pointer, while the stack pointer does not have tags. This discrepancy can lead to incorrect stack object detection and subsequently trigger warnings if CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS is also enabled. Example of the warning: ODEBUG: object 3eff800082ea7bb0 is NOT on stack ffff800082ea0000, but annotated. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/debugobjects.c:557 __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #4 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 lr : __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 sp : ffff800082ea7b40 x29: ffff800082ea7b40 x28: 98ff0000c0164518 x27: 98ff0000c0164534 x26: ffff800082d93ec8 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: 1cff0000c00172a0 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff800082d93ed0 x21: ffff800081a24418 x20: 3eff800082ea7bb0 x19: efff800000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 00000000000000ff x16: 0000000000000047 x15: 206b63617473206e x14: 0000000000000018 x13: ffff800082ea7780 x12: 0ffff800082ea78e x11: 0ffff800082ea790 x10: 0ffff800082ea79d x9 : 34d77febe173e800 x8 : 34d77febe173e800 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : feff800082ea74b8 x4 : ffff800082870a90 x3 : ffff80008018d3c4 x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffff800082858810 x0 : 0000000000000050 Call trace: __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 debug_object_init_on_stack+0x30/0x3c schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xac/0x26c schedule_hrtimeout+0x1c/0x30 wait_task_inactive+0x1d4/0x25c kthread_bind_mask+0x28/0x98 init_rescuer+0x1e8/0x280 workqueue_init+0x1a0/0x3cc kernel_init_freeable+0x118/0x200 kernel_init+0x28/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ODEBUG: object 3eff800082ea7bb0 is NOT on stack ffff800082ea0000, but annotated. ------------[ cut here ]------------

CVSS 3.1 · 5.5 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2025-65570

A type confusion in jsish 2.0 allows incorrect control flow during execution of the OP_NEXT opcode. When an “instanceof” expression uses an array element access as the left-hand operand inside a for-in loop, the instructions implementation leaves an additional array reference on the stack rather than consuming it during OP_INSTANCEOF. As a result, OP_NEXT interprets the array as an iterator object and reads the iterCmd function pointer from an invalid structure, potentially causing a crash or enabling code execution depending on heap layout.

CVSS 3.1 · 9.8 Critical EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products