Search vulnerabilities

Results 4,594

Export CSV
CVE-2026-19845

TOTOLINK A800R lan.so cstecgi.cgi setStaticDhcpConfig stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was determined in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. This affects the function setStaticDhcpConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component lan.so. Executing a manipulation of the argument Comment can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-67192

Xlight FTP Server < 3.9.5 Pre-Auth Stack Buffer Overflow via SSH GCM Cipher

Xlight FTP Server before 3.9.5 contains a pre-authentication stack buffer overflow vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to corrupt stack memory by sending malformed SSH packets when a GCM cipher is negotiated. Attackers can craft packets with an unvalidated length field passed directly to the GCM decrypt function, overwriting the stack cookie and return address to potentially achieve remote code execution before any authentication occurs.

CVSS 4.0 · 9.2 Critical EPSS 1.0% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-60095

Vinchin Backup & Recovery 9.0.0.86562 Stack Buffer Overflow via ModuleHandShake

Vinchin Backup & Recovery through 9.0.0.86562 contains a stack buffer overflow vulnerability in the ModuleHandShake function of the agentlink_server service that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to overwrite the saved return address by supplying an oversized _listen_uuid field that is measured via strlen() and copied without bounds checking into a fixed-length stack buffer using strcpy(). Attackers can send a crafted request with a malicious _listen_uuid value to corrupt the stack and achieve process crash or potential control flow hijack without requiring authentication.

CVSS 4.0 · 6.9 Medium EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-19814

TOTOLINK A800R firewall.so cstecgi.cgi setMacQos stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Affected is the function setMacQos of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component firewall.so. Performing a manipulation of the argument macAddress results in stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-19822

Tenda W20E QoS Edit editQos lstAdd stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was identified in Tenda W20E 15.11.0.6(1068_1546_841)_CN_TDC. This issue affects the function lstAdd of the file /goform/editQos of the component QoS Edit. Such manipulation of the argument qosListConnecttedNum leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-19812

TOTOLINK A800R product.so cstecgi.cgi UploadCustomModule stack-based overflow

A weakness has been identified in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. This affects the function UploadCustomModule of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component product.so. This manipulation of the argument File causes stack-based buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-64919

Microsoft Access Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-64907

Microsoft Office Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-64912

Microsoft Access Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-19791

Tenda G0 httpd web management interface module addStaticRoute stack-based overflow

A weakness has been identified in Tenda G0 up to 20260625. The affected element is the function addStaticRoute of the file /goform/module of the component httpd web management interface. Executing a manipulation of the argument staticRouteNet can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
G0
CVE-2026-19824

Tenda W20E addIpMacBind ipMacBindListStore stack-based overflow

A weakness has been identified in Tenda W20E 15.11.0.6(1068_1546_841)_CN_TDC. The affected element is the function ipMacBindListStore of the file /goform/addIpMacBind. Executing a manipulation of the argument IPMacBindRule can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-19789

Tenda AC1206 httpd web management interface WifiGuestSet set_wl_guest_iplist stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was determined in Tenda AC1206 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01. This vulnerability affects the function set_wl_guest_iplist of the file /goform/WifiGuestSet of the component httpd web management interface. This manipulation of the argument shareSpeed causes stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-63526

Microsoft Office Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products
CVE-2026-18724

open-iscsi: open-iscsi: Stack buffer overflow in idbm record parsing

AI_ONLY_REPORT package: iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.11-0.git4b3e853.el10 ------ Summary: Stack Buffer Overflow in idbm_recinfo_config via Malicious iSCSI Target: a crafted SendTargets TargetName can inject an extra configuration line into a persisted node record and later cause a stack buffer overflow when that record is reparsed. Requirements to exploit: An attacker must control an iSCSI target or tamper with SendTargets discovery traffic, return a crafted `TargetName` containing a newline and oversized injected key or value data, have the victim run persistent discovery, and then trigger a later node-record read such as update or login. Component affected: `iscsi-initiator-utils`; `usr/idbm.c:idbm_recinfo_config`, with attacker-controlled input reaching it through SendTargets handling in `usr/discovery.c` and later record serialization in `usr/idbm.c`. Version affected: `iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.11-0.git4b3e853.el10` Patch available: no released package fix established; proposed patch included below Version fixed: unknown Upstream coordination: Not notified. CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - 7.5 (HIGH) AV:N - The attacker can supply the malicious data over the network in a SendTargets discovery response. AC:L - The target-name length cap still leaves enough room for a newline plus an overlong injected key; no race or unusual memory state is required. PR:N - No prior access to the initiator is required. UI:R - The victim must run SendTargets discovery that persists records and later read the saved record. S:U - The impact remains within the initiator-side component that parses and stores its own database records. C:L - Memory corruption could expose limited process memory, but confidentiality impact is not demonstrated. I:L - Process memory corruption can affect integrity, but reliable code execution is not established. A:H - The clearest supported outcome is a crash during config parsing. Impact: Moderate. This issue could otherwise resemble an Important remote denial-of-service flaw, but Red Hat rates such issues lower when they are less easily exploited or depend on narrower conditions. Here, exploitation requires a multi-step SendTargets discovery workflow, persistence of the discovered record, and a later reread of that record. The strongest supported outcome is denial of service or other memory corruption, while code execution remains unproven. Embargo: no Reason: The available evidence supports a multi-step, configuration-dependent denial-of-service or memory-corruption issue rather than a demonstrated remote code execution flaw, so embargoed handling does not appear necessary. Acknowledgement: Aisle Research Vulnerability Details: `idbm_recinfo_config()` copies config keys and values into fixed stack buffers without bounds checks: ```c while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') { *(name+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } ... while (*nl) { *(value+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } ``` In this code path, `name` and `value` are 128-byte and 256-byte stack buffers, so an injected key longer than 128 bytes or a value longer than 256 bytes can corrupt stack memory. During SendTargets discovery, attacker-controlled `TargetName` text is copied into the node record and later written back to disk without control-character filtering: ```c strlcpy(rec->name, targetname, TARGET_NAME_MAXLEN); ... if (strlen(info[i].value)) fprintf(f, "%s = %s\n", info[i].name, info[i].value); ``` `process_sendtargets_response()` treats `TargetName=` records as discovery input, and `add_target_record()` accepts names up to `TARGET_NAME_MAXLEN`. That limit is 255 bytes in this package, which is still enough to carry a newline plus a key longer than the 128-byte `name` buffer. A `TargetName` such as `iqn.test\nAAAA...=B` can therefore split the serialized `node.name` entry into two lines and inject a second config line. Persistent SendTargets discovery stores discovered node records unless nonpersistent mode is used, and later discovery update/login or explicit node operations reread those saved records. The 2048-byte line buffer in `idbm_recinfo_config()` does not prevent this because the injected line only needs to exceed 128 bytes for the key or 256 bytes for the value. Based on the available evidence, the supported impact is a crash or other memory corruption during reparsing. Reliable code execution is plausible but not established. Steps to reproduce: 1. Run a malicious SendTargets responder, or intercept discovery traffic, and return a `TargetName` value containing a newline and an oversized injected key, for example `TargetName=iqn.test\nAAAAAAAA...(>=129 chars)=B`. 2. Run SendTargets discovery in its normal persistent mode. The default `iscsiadm -m discovery ...` workflow persists records unless nonpersistent mode is selected. 3. Inspect the saved node record and confirm that it contains both the expected `node.name = ...` line and an injected `AAAA...=B` line. 4. Trigger any operation that rereads the node record, such as discovery update, node update, or login. 5. Observe a crash during parsing. With instrumentation enabled, the overflow should be reported in `idbm_recinfo_config()`. Mitigation: Until a fix is available, avoid persistent SendTargets discovery against untrusted or interceptable networks. Where operationally acceptable, use nonpersistent discovery, and remove node records created from untrusted discovery results before later update or login operations. Proposed Fix: The fix should address both parts of the chain: bound the key and value copies in `idbm_recinfo_config()` and reject control characters in `TargetName` before persistence. ```diff diff --git a/usr/idbm.c b/usr/idbm.c @@ void idbm_recinfo_config(recinfo_t *info, FILE *f) while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') { *(name+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } + while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') { + if (i >= NAME_MAXVAL - 1) { + log_warning("Config file line %d key too long", line_number); + break; + } + name[i++] = *nl++; + } @@ while (*nl) { *(value+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } + while (*nl) { + if (i >= VALUE_MAXVAL - 1) { + log_warning("Config file line %d value too long", line_number); + break; + } + value[i++] = *nl++; + } diff --git a/usr/discovery.c b/usr/discovery.c @@ static int add_target_record(char *name, char *end, discovery_rec_t *drec, while ((nul < end) && (*nul != '\0')) nul++; + for (char *p = name; p < nul; p++) { + if (*p == '\n' || *p == '\r' || (unsigned char)*p < 0x20) { + log_error("TargetName contains control characters, rejecting"); + return 0; + } + } ``` ------ This report was generated using AI technology. Always review AI-generated content prior to use

CVSS 3.1 · 7.6 High EPSS n/a KEV · Not listed
Products
CVE-2026-19815

TOTOLINK A800R firewall.so cstecgi.cgi setParentalRules stack-based overflow

A flaw has been found in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setParentalRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component firewall.so. Executing a manipulation of the argument urlKeyword can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
CVE-2026-68817

Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.8 High EPSS < 1% KEV · Not listed
Vendors
Products