shopxo v6.4.0 has a ssrf/xss vulnerability in multiple places.

OneNav 1.1.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in custom headers.

An issue was discovered in OpenText Content Suite Platform 22.1 (16.2.19.1803). The endpoint notify.localizeEmailTemplate allows a low-privilege user to evaluate webreports.

WordPress AI ENGINE plugin <= 2.4.7 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jordy Meow AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot: from n/a through 2.4.7.

iteachyou Dreamer CMS edit cross site scripting

A vulnerability was found in iteachyou Dreamer CMS 4.1.3. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/archives/edit. The manipulation of the argument editorValue/answer/content leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

RCE, Full Read SSRF, and Arbitrary File Read in infiniflow/ragflow

In infiniflow/ragflow versions 0.12.0, the `web_crawl` function in `document_app.py` contains multiple vulnerabilities. The function does not filter URL parameters, allowing attackers to exploit Full Read SSRF by accessing internal network addresses and viewing their content through the generated PDF files. Additionally, the lack of restrictions on the file protocol enables Arbitrary File Read, allowing attackers to read server files. Furthermore, the use of an outdated Chromium headless version with --no-sandbox mode enabled makes the application susceptible to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via known Chromium v8 vulnerabilities. These issues are resolved in version 0.14.0.

WordPress Ninja Tables plugin <= 5.0.9 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables.This issue affects Ninja Tables: from n/a through 5.0.9.

In certain Lexmark products through 2023-01-12, SSRF can occur because of a lack of input validation.

ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The document editor service can be abused to read and serve arbitrary URLs as a document.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in langgenius/dify

langgenius/dify version 0.9.1 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability exists due to improper handling of the api_endpoint parameter, allowing an attacker to make direct requests to internal network services. This can lead to unauthorized access to internal servers and potentially expose sensitive information, including access to the AWS metadata endpoint.

SSRF in infiniflow/ragflow

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in infiniflow/ragflow version 0.12.0. The vulnerability is present in the `POST /v1/llm/add_llm` and `POST /v1/conversation/tts` endpoints. Attackers can specify an arbitrary URL as the `api_base` when adding an `OPENAITTS` model, and subsequently access the `tts` REST API endpoint to read contents from the specified URL. This can lead to unauthorized access to internal web resources.

SSRF in composiohq/composio

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in composiohq/composio version v0.4.2, specifically in the /api/actions/execute/WEBTOOL_SCRAPE_WEBSITE_CONTENT endpoint. This vulnerability allows an attacker to read files, access AWS metadata, and interact with local services on the system.

Inflectra SpiraTeam 7.2.00 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the NewsReaderService. This allows an attacker to escalate privileges and obtain sensitive information.

Pz-LinkCard <= 2.5.1 - Contributor+ SSRF

The Pz-LinkCard WordPress plugin through 2.5.1 does not prevent users from pinging arbitrary hosts via some of its shortcodes, which could allow high privilege users such as contributors to perform SSRF attacks.

An issue in the website background of taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

zhangyd-c OneBlog RestApiController.java autoLink server-side request forgery

A vulnerability was found in zhangyd-c OneBlog up to 2.3.9. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function autoLink of the file com/zyd/blog/controller/RestApiController.java. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/mychannel_add.php

Telefication <= 1.8.0 Open Proxy and Server-Side Request Forgery

The Telefication WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Open Proxy and Server-Side Request Forgery via the ~/bypass.php file due to a user-supplied URL request value that gets called by a curl requests. This affects versions up to, and including, 1.8.0.

HCL BigFix Platform is susceptible to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

An administrative user of WebReports may perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exploit through SMTP configuration options.

SeaCMS v13.1 was discovered to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at /admin_reslib.php.