Addressable display_uri can show misleading hosts containing bidi and invisible characters

Addressable is an alternative implementation to the URI implementation that is part of Ruby's standard library. From 2.0.0 until 2.9.1, Addressable::IDNA.to_unicode can decode Punycode labels that contain bidirectional controls, zero-width characters, control characters, or other default-ignorable format characters. Addressable::URI#display_uri can consequently show a reordered or visually indistinguishable hostname even though host, normalized_host, and network connections use the original encoded hostname. The pure-Ruby backend accepts the full prohibited set, while the native libidn backend is affected from 2.5.2 for characters added after Unicode 3.2. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.1.

Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

User interface (ui) misrepresentation of critical information in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

Hisense VIDAA Smart TV SSRF via SetAVTransportURI CurrentURI

Hisense VIDAA Smart TV firmware V0000.01.00a.P0220 contains an input validation vulnerability in the UPnP/DLNA AVTransport SOAP service that allows a LAN-adjacent attacker to inject arbitrary URIs via the CurrentURI field of SetAVTransportURI without validating the scheme, host, or media legitimacy. Attackers can supply schemes such as http://, file:///data/misc/wifi/, rtsp://, or smb:// to have the TV fetch and render attacker-controlled content after a one-time DLNA pairing, enabling phishing pages, fake firmware prompts, and fake emergency alerts to be displayed, with subsequent commands executing silently.

chromium-browser: UI misrepresentation in iOSWeb

UI misrepresentation in iOSWeb in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to spoof address bar via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

chromium-browser: UI misrepresentation in Input

UI misrepresentation in Input in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to spoof address bar via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) Spoofing Vulnerability

No cwe for this issue in Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

An unprivileged application can exploit a lack of package/signature validation in SystemUI's `RemoteQCController` when resolving a hardcoded `content://` URI. This allows the attacker to squat on a specific authority if the legitimate package is absent, inject spoofed UI elements into the trusted SystemUI Quick Controls panel, and gain a Background Activity Launch (BAL) grant from SystemUI when the user interacts with the spoofed element.

chromium-browser: UI misrepresentation in Extensions

UI misrepresentation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to spoof UI elements via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Frame poisoning in the Layout component

Frame poisoning in the Layout component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 153.5, Thunderbird 158, Thunderbird 153.5, and Firefox ESR 115.45.

Android UI Deception Allows Local Credential Theft

In onCreate of GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into granting account credentials due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

USB dialog UI confusion allows local privilege escalation on Android

In UsbDialogHelper of UsbDialogHelper.java, there is a possible UI confusion due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Local Privilege Escalation via Misleading App Widget Binding UI

In multiple functions of AllowBindAppWidgetActivity.java, there is a possible misunderstanding of reject/consent actions due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

UI Overlay Logic Error in InputMonitor.java Enables Local Tapjacking Privilege Escalation

In updateInputWindows of InputMonitor.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

chromium-browser: UI misrepresentation in Payments

UI misrepresentation in Payments in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Logic Error in Android AccountManagerService Enables Local Privilege Escalation

In onResult of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible untrusted/misleading UI issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Tap-jacking Attack to Expose Autofill Data

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into disclosing Autofill contents due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Android Tapjacking/Overlay Attack Enables Local Privilege Escalation

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

Misleading UI Enables Local Privilege Escalation by Device Forgetting

In getAppLabel of ForgetDeviceDialogFragment.java, there is a possible trick the user into forgetting a device due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In getApplicationLabel of KeyChainActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving access to certificates due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Misleading UI Allows Local Installation of Certificates without User Consent

In getCallingAppLabel of CertInstaller.java, there is a possible way to hide a sensitive security dialogue due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.